Skip to content
PLPauline Letters
English
Enter the story →

Letter guide · c. AD 55–56

2 Corinthians

2 Corinthians should be read as a letter to a particular community before it is reduced to a collection of isolated quotations.

Created and edited by Thomas Diong · Updated

A direct answer

Why did Paul write 2 Corinthians, and what is debated about its setting or authorship?

Second Corinthians is a deeply personal appeal after a painful period, defending Paul’s ministry, pursuing reconciliation, organizing the Jerusalem collection, and confronting rival claims to authority.

The letter gives strong internal evidence for a strained relationship, but the full sequence of visits and lost letters is not preserved.

Date
c. AD 55–56

Confidence Inferred

Macedonia is a region, not a securely named city of composition; another major chronology places the same Macedonian setting in AD 57.
Place
Macedonia

Confidence Inferred

Macedonia is a region, not a securely named city of composition; another major chronology places the same Macedonian setting in AD 57.
Audience

The letter addresses the church in Corinth together with believers across Achaia after a painful period in their relationship with Paul.

Occasion

Paul explains his conduct, rejoices in Titus’s report, calls for restored trust, urges completion of the collection, and exposes status-driven claims to apostolic superiority.

Journey

Paul’s Final Journey to Jerusalem

Acts and the journey

Acts places Paul in Macedonia after the Ephesian disturbance; the letter’s movement from Troas and reunion with Titus coheres with that transition.

Before and after

  • Established
  • Inferred
  • Uncertain

  1. c. AD 54/55

    Writes 1 Corinthians (Apollos evidently back at Ephesus with Paul, 1 Cor 16:12), answering the Corinthian divisions — Paul/Apollos/Cephas — that "I planted. Apollos watered. But God gave the increase".

    Ephesus

    Established

  2. c. AD 55/56

    A painful visit and a severe letter (now lost) to Corinth.

    Ephesus · Corinth

    Inferred

  3. c. AD 55/56

    The silversmiths riot over Artemis; Paul leaves for Macedonia.

    Ephesus

    Established

  4. c. AD 55/56

    A door opens at Troas; on to Macedonia; Titus brings good news; writes 2 Corinthians — defending his ministry against the intruding rivals he brands "false apostles" and ironically calls the "super-apostles", and glorying in weakness.

    Alexandria Troas · Macedonia

    Established

  5. c. AD 55/56

    Encourages Macedonia; organizes the collection; ministry as far as Illyricum.

    Macedonia · Illyricum

    Inferred

  6. c. AD 56/57

    Three months in Greece; writes Romans; a plot changes his route home.

    Corinth · Cenchreae

    Established
2 Corinthians — Before and after1. c. AD 54/55: Writes 1 Corinthians (Apollos evidently back at Ephesus with Paul, 1 Cor 16:12), answering the Corinthian divisions — Paul/Apollos/Cephas — that "I planted. Apollos watered. But God gave the increase". 2. c. AD 55/56: A painful visit and a severe letter (now lost) to Corinth. 3. c. AD 55/56: The silversmiths riot over Artemis; Paul leaves for Macedonia. 4. c. AD 55/56: A door opens at Troas; on to Macedonia; Titus brings good news; writes 2 Corinthians — defending his ministry against the intruding rivals he brands "false apostles" and ironically calls the "super-apostles", and glorying in weakness. 5. c. AD 55/56: Encourages Macedonia; organizes the collection; ministry as far as Illyricum. 6. c. AD 56/57: Three months in Greece; writes Romans; a plot changes his route home.
  1. Ephesusc. AD 54/55
  2. Ephesus · Corinthc. AD 55/56
  3. Ephesusc. AD 55/56
  4. Alexandria Troas · Macedoniac. AD 55/56
  5. Macedonia · Illyricumc. AD 55/56Interpretive reconstruction
  6. Corinth · Cenchreaec. AD 56/57

What the text establishes

Second Corinthians is a deeply personal appeal after a painful period, defending Paul’s ministry, pursuing reconciliation, organizing the Jerusalem collection, and confronting rival claims to authority.

2 Corinthians 1:1–2:4 · 2 Corinthians 2:1–4; 7:5–16; 8:1–9:15; 10:1–13:13

The letter gives strong internal evidence for a strained relationship, but the full sequence of visits and lost letters is not preserved.

The letter addresses the church in Corinth together with believers across Achaia after a painful period in their relationship with Paul.

2 Corinthians 1:1–2:4 · 2 Corinthians 1:1; 7:6; 8:16–24

The opponents cannot be identified with confidence beyond the descriptions in the letter.

Paul explains his conduct, rejoices in Titus’s report, calls for restored trust, urges completion of the collection, and exposes status-driven claims to apostolic superiority.

2 Corinthians 2:1–4; 7:5–16; 8:1–9:15; 10:1–13:13 · 2 Corinthians 1:1–2:4

The sharp turn near the end leaves open questions about the letter’s literary history.

Paul, Titus, Timothy, the Corinthian believers, Troas, and Macedonia form the letter’s named emotional and practical geography.

2 Corinthians 1:1; 7:6; 8:16–24 · 2 Corinthians 1:1–2:4 · 2 Corinthians 2:12–13; 7:5–7

Titus’s exact itinerary, the collection’s full route, and the identities of the rivals remain partly hidden.

Direct Pauline authorship and a Macedonian setting are not seriously disputed, while both the precise year and the unity of the canonical letter remain debated.

2 Corinthians 2:12–13; 7:5–7

Some interpreters read the whole as one crafted letter; others see more than one preserved stage of correspondence, and major chronology systems differ by roughly two years.

People and places

  • Paulwriter and defender of his ministry
  • Tituscoworker whose report matters to the reconciliation
  • Timothycoworker named in the greeting
  • Corinthian believersthe community receiving the appeal

Alexandria Troas · Macedonia · Corinth · Jerusalem

Leading reconstruction

The Pauline Letters chronology places the letter in Macedonia around AD 55–56, after Paul left Ephesus and before his later stay in Greece.

2 Corinthians 2:12–13; 7:5–7

Macedonia is a region, not a securely named city of composition; another major chronology places the same Macedonian setting in AD 57.

Other credible readings

One letter or several stages

Some scholars read the canonical form as a unified composition; others think it preserves more than one stage of Paul’s correspondence with Corinth.

The main Macedonian setting can remain plausible, but the order and tone of individual sections are read differently.

Inferred

Why the readings differ 2 Corinthians is widely regarded as Pauline, though many interpreters think its present form may preserve more than one stage of correspondence. It is commonly placed in Macedonia around AD 55–56.

Sources

Primary texts

  1. Romans through Philemon, World English Bible (public domain).The Pauline letters
  2. Acts 7–28, World English Bible (public domain).The Acts of the Apostles

Scholarship

  1. Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to the New Testament (Doubleday, 1997).
    • Chapter 23, “Second Letter to the Corinthians,” “General Analysis of the Message”Brown surveys the letter’s argument and strained relationship with Corinth.
    • Chapter 23, “Second Letter to the Corinthians,” “Summary of Basic Information”: “DATE” and “AUTHENTICITY”Brown treats authenticity as undisputed and compares a late-summer/early-autumn 57 date with AD 55/56 in a revisionist chronology, both in Macedonia.
    • Chapter 23, “Second Letter to the Corinthians,” “One Letter or a Compilation of Several Letters?”Brown surveys the competing accounts of the canonical letter’s unity.
  2. The project’s 67-row chronology, cross-referencing Acts and the letters and labeling debated dates.
  3. Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, Paul: A Critical Life (Oxford University Press, 1996).
    • Chapter 1, “The Chronological Framework,” “The Evidence from the Pauline Letters” and “The Evidence from the Acts of the Apostles”Murphy-O’Connor explains why chronology must weigh the letters and Acts without treating either as a complete timetable.
Revision v1.2.0-evidence.20260902.4
  1. v1.2.0-evidence.20260902.4 ·
Why the readings differ · Correction and revision policy

Teaching tools

A short, source-aware way to introduce this letter in a class, study group, or personal reading.

A ten-minute teaching plan

  1. Second Corinthians is a deeply personal appeal after a painful period, defending Paul’s ministry, pursuing reconciliation, organizing the Jerusalem collection, and confronting rival claims to authority.
  2. Second Corinthians follows First Corinthians and the painful exchanges, and it precedes Romans and the journey to Jerusalem with the collection.
  3. The Pauline Letters chronology places the letter in Macedonia around AD 55–56, after Paul left Ephesus and before his later stay in Greece.
  4. Some scholars read the canonical form as a unified composition; others think it preserves more than one stage of Paul’s correspondence with Corinth.

Questions for discussion

  • Why was this letter written?
  • What is secure, and where do careful readers disagree?

Revision v1.2.0-evidence.20260902.4 · Reuse and attribution · PaulineLetters.com

Date
c. AD 55–56
Written from
Macedonia
Authorship status
Widely accepted as Pauline; literary unity debated
Setting confidence
Macedonia, c. AD 55–56 (strong reconstruction)
Key line
2 Corinthians 4:7 — “But we have this treasure in clay vessels, that the exceeding greatness of the power may be of God and not from ourselves.”
Earliest witness shown
Papyrus 46, c. AD 200

Occasion and argument

A raw, personal defense of his ministry to the church at Corinth.

Second Corinthians opens after a period of injury and attempted repair. Paul refers to a painful visit and a severe letter, then describes the relief he felt when Titus brought news from Corinth. The first chapters defend his change of travel plans and insist that his conduct has been open rather than manipulative. Reconciliation is real, but the relationship remains fragile enough that Paul must explain both his affection and his authority.

The letter’s controlling image is treasure carried in jars of clay. Paul refuses to make apostolic authority look invulnerable: affliction, weakness, costly service, and the pattern of Jesus’ death disclose the character of ministry. His later “boasting” turns conventional status upside down by cataloguing hardship and ending with a weakness through which Christ’s power rests on him. The argument is personal because the credibility of the messenger has become part of the dispute.

The guide places 2 Corinthians alongside the travel chronology because its names, plans, conflicts, and greetings belong to a living network. Its key line, 2 Corinthians 4:7, is read in that larger movement rather than presented as a detached slogan.

Chronology and manuscript witness

Chapters 8–9 return to the collection for impoverished believers in Jerusalem. The Macedonian churches become an example of generosity under pressure, Titus helps administer the gift, and practical safeguards protect its integrity. For Paul the collection is more than fundraising. It is a material expression of fellowship across distance and ethnicity, testing whether the unity proclaimed in the gospel can become shared economic responsibility.

A Macedonian setting around AD 55–56 fits Paul’s reunion with Titus after leaving Troas and his plans to visit Corinth again. The sharp turn in chapters 10–13 has led many interpreters to ask whether the canonical letter combines more than one stage of correspondence; others read the shift as a deliberate final confrontation within one letter. Pauline authorship is widely accepted, while the document’s literary history remains openly debated.

Papyrus 46 (P46) is the witness pictured for this letter, dated c. AD 200 and associated with University of Michigan Library. Text shown. The image demonstrates textual survival in that manuscript tradition; it does not prove the proposed date or place of composition.

Authorship and dating

2 Corinthians is widely regarded as Pauline, though many interpreters think its present form may preserve more than one stage of correspondence. It is commonly placed in Macedonia around AD 55–56.

Common questions

When was 2 Corinthians written?

About AD 55-56, from Macedonia, after Paul left Ephesus and met Titus with news from Corinth. The setting is reconstructed from the travel notes inside the letter rather than stated by it.

Is 2 Corinthians one letter?

That is genuinely debated. The sharp change of tone at chapter 10 has led many interpreters to ask whether the canonical letter combines more than one stage of correspondence; others read the shift as a deliberate final confrontation. Pauline authorship is not in question either way.

What was the severe letter?

A painful letter Paul mentions having sent between visits, which has not survived. Attempts to identify it with part of the surviving correspondence are speculative, so this project treats it as lost.

Why does Paul boast about weakness?

Because his credibility had become part of the dispute. Rivals arrived with impressive credentials, so Paul answers by listing hardships and a thorn he was not relieved of, arguing that the pattern of Jesus’ death is what apostolic ministry actually looks like.

Bibliography and sources

  1. Romans through Philemon, World English Bible (public domain). View source
  2. The project’s 67-row chronology, cross-referencing Acts and the letters and labeling debated dates.
  3. Papyrus 46 and Codex Sinaiticus records, repositories, image sources, and rights in the Pauline Letters manuscript registry.
  4. Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to the New Testament (Doubleday, 1997).
  5. E. P. Sanders, Paul: The Apostle’s Life, Letters, and Thought (Fortress Press, 2015).
Canonical URL