---
title: "關於保羅、使徒行傳與書信的問題"
canonical: "https://paulineletters.com/zh-hant/explore/questions"
published: "2026-10-24"
updated: "2026-10-24"
language: "zh-Hant"
license: "https://paulineletters.com/zh-hant/explore/license"
source: "保羅書信 · Pauline Letters"
---

# 關於保羅、使徒行傳與書信的問題

> 以來源為依據，解答有關保羅、他的書信與使徒行傳的問題，並列明不同觀點、可信度、證據限制及精確出處。

**來源可以對保羅、使徒行傳與書信確立甚麼？**

## 如何使用本索引

這些解答區分來源的陳述、歷史重構與詮釋。每項解答均保留其可信度範圍、支持出處、不同觀點及關鍵限制。經文出處用以標明段落，並不轉載聖經文本。凡證據未能確定的日期、身分、作者歸屬及文本歷史，均保留相應限定。

聖經僅以經文出處引述。請在連結所指的譯本閱讀相關段落；如有需要，節數及文本附註會說明版本差異。

簡短解答與大綱，把這個方法應用於特定問題。經文出處標明在哪裏檢查主張，關鍵限制則解釋所引資料沒有確立甚麼。這讓人可仔細閱讀，而不把每項不確定都當作對整封書信的判決，也不以缺乏支持的共識聲稱，去解決實際分歧。

## 參考書目與資料來源


## [保羅、雅各書與信心及行為的新觀點](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives>)

保羅反對憑功績獲得接納，而雅各書則質疑沒有行動的信心；兩者針對不同的問題。按上下文閱讀，也可看出為何必須一併考慮個人得救、行為的轉變，以及猶太人與外邦人的群體歸屬，同時不把這些概念視為同義。

- [保羅與雅各書對信心和行為的看法是否矛盾？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-01>)

- [保羅在羅馬書第4章處理甚麼問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-02>)

- [在雅各書第2章中，雅各書針對甚麼問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-03>)

- [保羅為何把賺取報酬與信靠神相比？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-04>)

- [雅各書為何談及缺乏衣食的人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-05>)

- [亞伯拉罕在保羅於羅馬書第4章的論證中起甚麼作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-06>)

- [亞伯拉罕在雅各書第2章起甚麼作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-07>)

- [亞伯拉罕先有信心、後有行動的次序，如何影響羅馬書第4章與雅各書第2章的比較？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-08>)

- [雅各書如何連繫信心與行動？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-09>)

- [保羅如何連繫信心與愛？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-10>)

- [保羅與雅各書談論信心和行為時，「稱義」是甚麼意思？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-11>)

- [保羅討論信心與行為時，「稱義」必須與雅各書第2章的意思相同嗎？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-12>)

- [保羅是否認為合乎倫理的行為可有可無？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-13>)

- [雅各書是否把救恩說成人可以不靠恩典而賺取的東西？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-14>)

- [本站的福音派詮釋如何連繫稱義與生命的改變？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-15>)

- [加爾文如何區分稱義與更新？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-16>)

- [特倫托大公會議如何連繫稱義與更新？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-17>)

- [特倫托大公會議是否教導，先前的行為能賺取起初的恩典？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-18>)

- [《關於稱義教義的聯合聲明》對恩典、信心與善行有甚麼說法？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-20>)

- [對恩典達成共識，是否就能消除基督教信眾對稱義的所有分歧？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-21>)

- [如何比較羅馬書第4章與雅各書第2章，並保留兩者不同的論證？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-faith-and-works-22>)

- [「新觀點」希望重新審視保羅的哪些問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-01>)

- [為何用複數「新觀點」來描述這些研究更準確？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-02>)

- [鄧恩如何描述桑德斯對他的新觀點論證的貢獻？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-03>)

- [鄧恩如何說明猶太人與外邦人共同歸屬的意義？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-04>)

- [賴特如何界定自己研究保羅的進路？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-05>)

- [為何不應把桑德斯、鄧恩與賴特視為同一立場？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-06>)

- [同席用餐的衝突對加拉太書第2章有何意義？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-07>)

- [在「新觀點」對保羅的爭論中，「律法的行為」是甚麼意思？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-08>)

- [「律法的行為」只是猶太人身分的標記嗎？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-09>)

- [割禮在群體歸屬的論證中起甚麼作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-10>)

- [保羅談論亞伯拉罕時，為何包括未受割禮的信徒？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-11>)

- [強調盟約成員身分，是否排除了對個人得救的關注？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-12>)

- [新觀點是否必然否定恩典？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-13>)

- [「新觀點」的各種進路如何理解保羅論述中信心的作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-15>)

- [伯德對稱義的解釋，如何連繫神的判決與盟約歸屬？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-16>)

- [為何應把伯德對判決與盟約歸屬的綜合，視為對稱義的詮釋，而非中立定義？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-17>)

- [閱讀保羅時，判決與盟約歸屬是否都可以重要？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-18>)

- [「猶太教之內的保羅」進路與新觀點有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-19>)

- [為何把古代猶太教一概描繪為律法主義會造成誤導？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-20>)

- [為何「沒有道德要求的基督教」也是誤導性的對比？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-james-and-new-perspectives#q-new-perspectives-21>)

## [誰撰寫了希伯來書與教牧書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question>)

希伯來書沒有署明作者，教牧書信卻以保羅為寄信人。兩者起點不同，需要不同的論證：抄本中的編排關聯與後來的作者歸屬，不能代替作者署名；寄信人的聲稱，也須與語言、處境及流傳情況一併評估。

- [希伯來書是否署名保羅為作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-01>)

- [希伯來書的開首，與署名保羅的書信有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-02>)

- [提及提摩太，是否就能辨明希伯來書的作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-03>)

- [希伯來書第2章，對其信息如何被領受的問題提供了甚麼資料？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-04>)

- [為何希伯來書被收進保羅書信的文集？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-05>)

- [P46把希伯來書放在哪裏？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-06>)

- [抄本的書卷次序能否證明作者是誰？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-07>)

- [革利免的說法，如何提出希伯來書與保羅書信的關聯？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-08>)

- [路加如何進入古代關於希伯來書的討論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-09>)

- [俄利根如何區分思想與文風？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-10>)

- [俄利根關於實際作者的陳述為何重要？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-11>)

- [俄利根是否毫無保留地肯定，保羅撰寫了現存希伯來書的希臘文文本？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-12>)

- [特土良把希伯來書歸於誰？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-13>)

- [革利免與特土良對希伯來書作者的歸屬是否相同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-14>)

- [革利免、特土良與俄利根對希伯來書的歸屬，相對於該書信有多晚？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-15>)

- [為希伯來書提出一位可能譯者，是否就能確立原作的作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-16>)

- [與保羅的圈子有關，與由他直接撰寫有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-17>)

- [對作者的不確定，是否就能裁定一卷書的神學權威？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-19>)

- [讀者可以對希伯來書的作者作出甚麼負責任的結論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-hebrews-20>)

- [哪些書信稱為教牧書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-01>)

- [甚麼是託名寫作？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-02>)

- [三封教牧書信如何呈現其寄信人與收信人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-03>)

- [為何寄信人的聲稱與作者歸屬有關，卻不足以確定作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-04>)

- [教牧書信由保羅直接撰寫一說，為何有爭議？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-05>)

- [教牧書信作者歸屬的爭論，如何運用詞彙差異？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-06>)

- [教牧書信所描繪的教會生活，如何用於作者歸屬的爭論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-07>)

- [教牧書信的行程與處境，如何用於作者歸屬的爭論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-08>)

- [反對教牧書信由保羅直接撰寫的批判論證，為何屬於累積論證，而非基於一個罕見詞語？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-09>)

- [長老或監督的出現，能否證明成書年代較晚？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-10>)

- [腓立比書如何使單憑職分詞彙為教牧書信定年變得複雜？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-11>)

- [使徒行傳的領袖用語，如何影響單憑職分頭銜為教牧書信定年的做法？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-12>)

- [為支持教牧書信由保羅直接撰寫，學者提出了哪些解釋？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-13>)

- [可否假定一位可能的代筆人就能解釋所有差異？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-14>)

- [代筆協助與託名寫作有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-15>)

- [共同寄信與託名寫作有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-16>)

- [後期寫作的提案，是否必然指明欺騙動機？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-17>)

- [懷疑某封教牧書信由保羅直接撰寫，是否就能確立其確切年代？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-18>)

- [三封教牧書信是否必須有相同的寫作歷史？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-19>)

- [一項提案可否保留較早的個人資料，同時不把整封書信視為保羅直接撰寫？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-20>)

- [特土良反對一部關於特克拉的作品，實際上顯示了甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-21>)

- [作者歸屬有爭議，應如何影響對使徒行傳以後行程的重構？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/hebrews-and-the-pastoral-authorship-question#q-pastorals-23>)

## [保羅的婚姻與外貌：來源能告訴我們甚麼](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance>)

保羅的書信描述了他的處境與身體上的脆弱，卻沒有提供完整的婚姻歷史或全面肖像。後來的詮釋與肖像，值得作為接受史證據考察，同時須交代它們與他生平的時間距離。

- [對保羅的婚姻歷史，我們能知道甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-01>)

- [保羅在哥林多前書第7章的處境，與完整的終身傳記有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-02>)

- [保羅當時沒有配偶，能否證明他從未結婚？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-03>)

- [有甚麼支持保羅曾經喪偶的提案？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-04>)

- [哥林多前書第9章能否確立保羅曾帶妻子同行？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-05>)

- [身為法利賽人，能否證明保羅必定已婚？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-07>)

- [優西比烏所傳述的革利免，提出甚麼與妻子有關的詮釋？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-08>)

- [腓立比書第4章是否指名保羅的配偶？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-marriage-09>)

- [最早期的來源，是否提供保羅完整的外貌肖像？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-01>)

- [哥林多後書對保羅本人臨在的批評，實際上能確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-02>)

- [哥林多後書10:10所報告、對保羅言談的批評，能對他的外貌確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-03>)

- [《保羅與特克拉行傳》中的肖像，是哪一類來源？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-04>)

- [特克拉肖像的年代與文體為何重要？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-05>)

- [《保羅與特克拉行傳》中的肖像，能否確立它保存了目擊者的記憶？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-06>)

- [加拉太書能否把保羅的病辨明為眼疾？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-07>)

- [能否從所引書信診斷保羅的那根刺？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-08>)

- [後來的藝術作品能否復原保羅的真實面貌？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-09>)

- [保羅的外貌不確定時，應如何標示他的插圖？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-marriage-and-appearance#q-appearance-10>)

## [保羅與耶穌的教導](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching>)

比較保羅與耶穌傳統時，應以他明確指出的歸屬為依據，而傳遞方式仍是另一個問題。書信報告教導、啟示與接觸，卻沒有為每項傳統指明完整的傳遞鏈，也沒有證明保羅讀過一部已完成的福音書。

- [保羅是否知道與耶穌相關的教導？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-01>)

- [保羅在哪裏明確區分主的命令與自己的指示？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-02>)

- [哥林多前書第7章處理哪一項婚姻問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-03>)

- [哥林多前書7:12的婚姻個案，與7:10–11有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-04>)

- [應如何把保羅在哥林多前書第7章自己的指示，與他歸於主的命令一併理解？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-05>)

- [哥林多前書7:25如何限定接下來的指示？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-06>)

- [保羅的婚姻指示，與馬可福音的記錄如何比較？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-07>)

- [與馬可福音有平行之處，能否證明保羅讀過已完成的馬可福音？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-08>)

- [沒有提及福音書書名，是否表示保羅完全不知道耶穌傳統？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-09>)

- [保羅把哪一項供養的教導與主連繫起來？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-10>)

- [保羅明確把教導歸於主，與他的書信和福音書記錄之間的相似之處，有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-11>)

- [保羅在哥林多前書第11章，說自己領受並傳遞了哪些關於主餐的內容？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-12>)

- [「從主領受」是否必然表示每個細節都來自個人的直接啟示？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-13>)

- [承襲而來的傳統，最終能否被描述為來自主？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-14>)

- [為何用餐傳統的來源仍應是詮釋問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-15>)

- [復活的討論，如何區分所領受的宣講與顯現報告？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-16>)

- [保羅所報告、他自己領受的顯現，如何配合哥林多前書15:3–8？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-17>)

- [單憑顯現報告，能否確定其歷史評估？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-18>)

- [加拉太書如何說明保羅福音的來源？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-19>)

- [加拉太書報告了後來與磯法及雅各的哪些接觸？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-20>)

- [加拉太書1:18–19對保羅與磯法及雅各接觸時的內容，揭示了甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-21>)

- [強調啟示，是否排除了所有人的傳遞？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-22>)

- [不同傳統的社會傳遞與啟示，可否分別考慮？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-23>)

- [有甚麼證據顯示保羅在釘十字架以前曾見過耶穌？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-24>)

- [為何不應從後來與基督徒的接觸，推斷釘十字架以前的會面？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-25>)

- [讀者如何比較保羅與耶穌，而不捏造傳遞鏈？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/paul-and-jesus-teaching#q-jesus-teaching-26>)

## [保羅所受的猶太教育與羅馬公民身分](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship>)

應把保羅對自身猶太身分的描述，與使徒行傳有關教育及公民身分的報告一併閱讀，卻不把它們變成每項傳記細節的獨立證明。

- [使徒行傳為保羅的羅馬公民身分提供甚麼證據？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-01>)

- [公民身分的場景，是獨立記錄，還是同一敘事的不同部分？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-02>)

- [保羅在腓立比援引公民身分時，發生甚麼事？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-03>)

- [保羅在耶路撒冷擬議的鞭打之前援引公民身分時，發生甚麼事？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-04>)

- [保羅對生來擁有公民身分有甚麼說法？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-05>)

- [生來擁有公民身分，是否就能確立保羅的出生地？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-06>)

- [使徒行傳有沒有解釋保羅家族最初如何取得公民身分？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-07>)

- [使徒行傳有沒有確立，保羅家族透過服兵役或獲釋為自由人，取得羅馬公民身分？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-08>)

- [指揮官購買公民身分的經歷，能否解釋保羅自己的公民身分？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-09>)

- [保羅在使徒行傳為何向凱撒上訴？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-10>)

- [使徒行傳有沒有指名保羅所上訴的皇帝？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-11>)

- [亞基帕關於可能獲釋的評論，能否確定否則會發生甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-12>)

- [在敘事中，公民身分是否避免了每次毆打或拘禁？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-13>)

- [為何不應把法律背景變成適用於每場審判的絕對規則？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-14>)

- [小普林尼較晚的通信，可以提供甚麼有限比較？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-15>)

- [小普林尼的通信，是否獨立辨明保羅？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-16>)

- [除了使徒行傳的記錄，還有甚麼獨立證據支持保羅的羅馬公民身分？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-17>)

- [公民身分在使徒行傳中，如何同時具有法律與文學作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-18>)

- [文學功能能否證明公民身分場景是捏造的？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-19>)

- [程序上看似合理，能否認證使徒行傳每項事件？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-20>)

- [腓立比書的天上公民用語，與聲稱擁有羅馬公民地位有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-21>)

- [凱撒家族的問安，是否辨明一位皇帝，或證明保羅的法律地位？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-roman-citizenship-22>)

- [保羅在書信中如何描述自己的猶太人血統？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-01>)

- [保羅在哪裏表明自己屬於法利賽人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-02>)

- [保羅如何說明自己早年的熱心？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-03>)

- [可否把保羅對自身早年熱心的描述，概括到每一位法利賽人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-04>)

- [哪個來源說保羅曾受教於迦瑪列？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-05>)

- [保羅的書信有沒有指名迦瑪列是他的老師？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-06>)

- [使徒行傳第5章如何描繪迦瑪列？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-07>)

- [使徒行傳第5章與使徒行傳第22章，應否算作兩個獨立傳記來源？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-08>)

- [迦瑪列在使徒行傳的講話，能否證明他認可保羅後來的使命？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-09>)

- [能否從使徒行傳第22章，重構詳細課堂場景或課程？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-10>)

- [後來的拉比追念，如何談及老迦瑪列？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-11>)

- [《米示拿・索他篇》的記述，有沒有指名保羅或確認他曾受教？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-12>)

- [因特定場合而寫的書信保持沉默，是否就推翻了使徒行傳所述教育？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-14>)

- [傳統歷史讀法與來源批判讀法，如何評估使徒行傳關於保羅受教於迦瑪列的報告？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-15>)

- [跟隨耶穌，是否表示保羅不再自稱為猶太人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-16>)

- [為何不應把猶太人身分，簡化為試圖賺取救恩？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-17>)

- [讀者如何區分保羅本人的描述，與教育方面的重構？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-jewish-education-and-roman-citizenship#q-jewish-education-18>)

## [保羅的工作、餽贈與經濟支持](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support>)

保羅的生計，透過不同關係及目的呈現：體力勞動、物質援助、接待，以及為其他信徒募捐，不應被合併成單一財務模式。

- [哪個來源描述保羅與百基拉及亞居拉從事相同手藝？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-01>)

- [通常把保羅描述為製造帳棚的人，能確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-02>)

- [使徒行傳18:3的手藝描述，能對保羅使用的產品或材料確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-03>)

- [我們知道保羅工場的位置與設備嗎？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-04>)

- [保羅的書信如何描述他的體力工作？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-05>)

- [保羅為何把勞動與避免加重信徒負擔連繫起來？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-06>)

- [體力勞動能否證明保羅每次旅程都天天工作？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-07>)

- [保羅是否拒絕所有經濟支持？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-08>)

- [保羅在哥林多前書第9章，辯護哪一項獲得供養的權利？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-09>)

- [辯護經濟供養的權利，與選擇行使該權利有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-10>)

- [保羅在哥林多的選擇，是否要求每位傳道人都不受薪？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-11>)

- [保羅援引主的教導，在供養論證中發揮甚麼作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-12>)

- [保羅承認從馬其頓得到哪些物質幫助？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-13>)

- [保羅承認從腓立比信徒得到哪些支持？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-14>)

- [以巴弗提送來的禮物，如何配合保羅對腓立比信徒支持的記錄？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-15>)

- [缺乏送出援助的機會，是否表示腓立比信徒不再關心？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-16>)

- [接受餽贈，是否與保羅的體力勞動記錄矛盾？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-17>)

- [羅馬書明確讚許非比的哪些支持？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-18>)

- [非比的支持角色，是否辨明其確切職業？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-19>)

- [能否為非比重構精確的恩庇合約或款項？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-20>)

- [如何討論恩庇關係，而不捏造隱藏責任？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-21>)

- [在腓立比群體的處境中，「伙伴關係」是甚麼意思？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-22>)

- [接待如何促成宣教中的關係？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-23>)

- [羅馬書16:23對該猶作接待者有甚麼報告？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-24>)

- [羅馬書16:23稱為接待者的該猶，是否必須與使徒行傳或哥林多前書中任何一位名叫該猶的人認同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-25>)

- [如何連繫百基拉與亞居拉的工作及接待，而不補出家庭預算？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-26>)

- [保羅如何區分個人供養，與為其他信徒募捐？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-27>)

- [為何募捐需要群體共同承擔責任的安排？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-28>)

- [具名代表可以確立甚麼，而不把每位旅人都當作捐助者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-29>)

- [來源是否揭示保羅的全部收入或開支？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-30>)

- [可否把餽贈的語言，變成捐助者必定致富的應許？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-31>)

- [應如何區分現今應用，與保羅的特定財務選擇？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/pauls-work-and-financial-support#q-work-and-support-32>)

## [保羅書信如何寫成、組織與流傳](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read>)

傳承至今的十三封書信，可以同時從幾個層面閱讀。它們向個人及群體說話、提出論證、保存較早往來的記憶，並透過抄本流傳至今。這些層面相互關連，卻回答不同問題。有用的閱讀指引會跟隨現有論證，同時清楚說明何時從明確記述，轉向編輯性大綱或所提出的較早歷史。

- [書信具名的寄信人，與把它寫下來的人有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-01>)

- [羅馬書中的德丟是誰？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-02>)

- [德丟的寫信記述，有沒有說明他有多少寫作自由？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-03>)

- [代筆參與，是否使德丟成為羅馬書具名的作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-04>)

- [甚麼是共同寄信人？與代筆人有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-05>)

- [所有第一人稱複數，是否都自動包括每位具名共同寄信人？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-06>)

- [關於保羅親筆的記述，為書信提供甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-07>)

- [署名聲稱，是否獨立認證每封被歸於某人的書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-08>)

- [閱讀署名記述時，應如何讓作者歸屬的爭議保持可見？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-09>)

- [使徒行傳明確描繪保羅使用哪些語言？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-10>)

- [為何使徒行傳第21至22章的語言稱謂，被討論為希伯來語或亞蘭語？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-11>)

- [使徒行傳21:37–22:2能對保羅所說的語言確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-12>)

- [以希臘話書寫的抄本流傳，能對傳承至今的書信確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-13>)

- [現存抄本的語言，是否指明每次原始對話的語言？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-14>)

- [哥林多前書第5章提及哪一封較早書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-15>)

- [哥林多前書5:9–11提及的較早通信，可以重構多少？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-16>)

- [哥林多後書提及哪一封令人憂傷的較早書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-17>)

- [為何把那封令人痛苦的書信與現存資料認同，屬於重構？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-18>)

- [歌羅西書要求與老底嘉作甚麼書信交換？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-19>)

- [與老底嘉的交換，能否認證後來的偽經書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-20>)

- [歌羅西書4:16的書信交換，是否把以弗所書辨認為來自老底嘉的書信？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-composition-21>)

- [對羅馬書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-romans-01>)

- [羅馬書第9至11章，如何配合書信對憐憫及歸屬的討論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-romans-02>)

- [結尾的宣教計劃及問安，如何配合羅馬書的論證？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-romans-03>)

- [對哥林多前書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-corinthians-01>)

- [愛與責任如何連繫哥林多前書各種群體爭議？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-corinthians-02>)

- [復活討論為何對哥林多前書的結構重要？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-corinthians-03>)

- [對哥林多後書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-corinthians-01>)

- [募捐段落如何配合哥林多後書對事奉與復和的描述？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-corinthians-02>)

- [哥林多後書語調轉變，能否證明某項特定編纂理論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-corinthians-03>)

- [對加拉太書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-galatians-01>)

- [應許與亞伯拉罕，如何連繫加拉太書對自由的討論？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-galatians-02>)

- [保羅的蒙召記錄，在加拉太書中起甚麼作用？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-galatians-03>)

- [對以弗所書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-ephesians-01>)

- [猶太人與外邦人的復和，如何連繫以弗所書對合一的呼籲？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-ephesians-02>)

- [應如何把以弗所書的家庭段落，放在更廣泛的行為指示中？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-ephesians-03>)

- [對腓立比書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philippians-01>)

- [腓立比書對基督謙卑的呈現，如何支持其群體勸勉？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philippians-02>)

- [腓立比書結尾對餽贈的承認，如何連繫書信較早的伙伴關係？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philippians-03>)

- [對歌羅西書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-colossians-01>)

- [歌羅西書對基督的呈現，與更新生命的指示有何關係？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-colossians-02>)

- [歌羅西書結尾的送信記述，對理解書信處境提供甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-colossians-03>)

- [對帖撒羅尼迦前書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-thessalonians-01>)

- [回憶宣教，如何為帖撒羅尼迦前書後來的鼓勵作準備？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-thessalonians-02>)

- [帖撒羅尼迦前書討論已故信徒時，如何連繫盼望與互相關顧？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-thessalonians-03>)

- [對帖撒羅尼迦後書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-thessalonians-01>)

- [帖撒羅尼迦後書對主的日子的討論，如何關乎壓力下的持守穩定？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-thessalonians-02>)

- [帖撒羅尼迦後書結尾的工作指示，如何配合其群體責任的描述？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-thessalonians-03>)

- [對提摩太前書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-timothy-01>)

- [提摩太前書如何連繫教導、領袖與群體照顧？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-timothy-02>)

- [提摩太前書對財富的處理，如何屬於其更廣泛的行為描述？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-1-timothy-03>)

- [對提摩太後書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-timothy-01>)

- [提摩太後書如何連繫忍耐與保存教導？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-timothy-02>)

- [如何閱讀提摩太後書的個人告別，而不裁定其有爭議的寫作歷史？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-2-timothy-03>)

- [對提多書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-titus-01>)

- [提多書如何連繫恩典與善行？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-titus-02>)

- [提多書中的克里特島囑咐，是否提供使徒行傳以後的完整行程？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-titus-03>)

- [對腓利門書提出甚麼大綱？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philemon-01>)

- [腓利門書關於阿尼西謀的懇求，與公開列明的法律合約有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philemon-02>)

- [腓利門書有沒有告訴讀者最終結果，或明確記錄釋奴？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-letter-reading-philemon-03>)

- [抄本異文與原始文本論證，有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-01>)

- [為何不同版本引用羅馬書頌榮時，節數不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-02>)

- [頌榮在本站固定採用的WEB羅馬書中位於哪裏？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-03>)

- [應如何在本站固定採用的《世界英語聖經》中，把留空的羅馬書16:25座標，與位於羅馬書14:24–26的頌榮一併閱讀？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-04>)

- [P46把羅馬書頌榮放在哪裏？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-05>)

- [雖然頌榮位置不同，P46是否仍保存羅馬書第16章？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-06>)

- [單憑P46的頌榮位置，能否確立羅馬書原來形式較短？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-07>)

- [對羅馬書第16章的傳承書信解釋，與另一目的地假說有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-08>)

- [關於羅馬書較早版本的提案，有甚麼仍屬重構？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-09>)

- [哥林多前書14:34–35涉及甚麼文本問題？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-10>)

- [段落移位與省略有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-11>)

- [移位能否自動證明哥林多前書14:34–35是後來加入的？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-12>)

- [佩恩對哥林多前書14:34–35提出甚麼較晚增補的論證？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-13>)

- [麥格雷戈對哥林多前書14:34–35提出甚麼「引用並反駁」的詮釋？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-14>)

- [佩恩關於哥林多前書第14章的直接回應，與麥格雷戈的論證有何不同？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-15>)

- [保留哥林多前書14:34–35，是否必須接受引用詮釋？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-16>)

- [在哥林多前書14:34–35的爭論中，抄本符號與位置變動為何重要？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-17>)

- [一段經文的不確定，能否決定整封書信的可靠性？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/how-pauls-letters-were-written-and-read#q-textual-variants-19>)

## [誰撰寫了使徒行傳，何時寫成？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when>)

使徒行傳把自身與一部較早作品連繫起來，卻沒有署明作者。旅行敘事、古代歸於路加的說法、結尾及歷史細節，為作者歸屬與定年提供不同證據；每種證據的限制，都應保留在結論中。

- [使徒行傳有沒有署明作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-01>)

- [使徒行傳如何回指較早的作品？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-02>)

- [路加福音與使徒行傳的開首有甚麼聯繫？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-03>)

- [共同的收信人，是否就能把作者辨認為路加？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-04>)

- [傳統上認為使徒行傳的作者是誰？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-05>)

- [愛任紐明確把甚麼歸於路加？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-06>)

- [愛任紐如何把路加與旅行敘事者連繫起來？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-07>)

- [優西比烏為路加傳統提供了甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-08>)

- [愛任紐及優西比烏所報告的路加作者歸屬，與使徒行傳敘述的事件有何關係？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-09>)

- [使徒行傳的旅行敘事在哪些地方轉為第一人稱複數？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-10>)

- [使徒行傳第一人稱複數的旅行段落，是否指名路加為敘事者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-11>)

- [對使徒行傳第一人稱複數旅行段落的「參與者解釋」是甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-12>)

- [對使徒行傳「我們」段落的「納入來源解釋」是甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-13>)

- [對使徒行傳「我們」段落的「文學敘事解釋」是甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-14>)

- [如何負責任地把具名同伴，與使徒行傳第一人稱複數段落連繫起來？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-16>)

- [使徒行傳在何處結束對保羅的記錄？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-17>)

- [結尾有沒有敘述保羅的死亡？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-18>)

- [使徒行傳沒有記述保羅的死亡，是否就能確立本書在他死前完成？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-19>)

- [使徒行傳的結尾，對早期成書論證有甚麼貢獻？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-20>)

- [使徒行傳的結尾，可以對文學閱讀有甚麼貢獻？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-21>)

- [使徒行傳主要有哪些定年範圍提案，各自提出甚麼證據？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-22>)

- [拉姆齊對使徒行傳的歷史準確性，提出了哪一類論證？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-23>)

- [拉姆齊的論證能否確定本書的確切年代？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-24>)

- [理查德．珀沃為使徒行傳提出甚麼年代？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-25>)

- [若要確立使徒行傳在文學上依賴弗拉維烏斯．約瑟夫斯的提案，需要甚麼證據？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-26>)

- [正確使用官方頭銜，可以對使徒行傳確立甚麼？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-27>)

- [地理準確，能否證明路加是作者？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-28>)

- [確認處境的銘文，能否認證每一項所述事件？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-29>)

- [與書信之間的相符、張力及沉默，應如何分開處理？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-30>)

- [為何簡短解答中的使徒行傳定年範圍，仍應保留不確定性？](</zh-hant/explore/articles/who-wrote-acts-and-when#q-acts-author-date-32>)

---

規範網址: https://paulineletters.com/zh-hant/explore/questions